Closed 5 days ago. Yes, with the largest total ever locked on a protocol question.
77%
yes · 2,180 BSV days · 31 wallets
23%
no · 667 BSV days · 16 wallets
30 comments, on the hour each was said. Play them, or hover a face.
This proposal closed Yes, which committed the organiser to the action in its criteria. Their record of doing it is below, and they are the only person who can add to it.
Published. Eleven days early, deprecation window extended to nine months on the vendors' request. Three of the four have confirmed they are already compliant. Link is on the Association's technical recommendations page, which is the source this proposal named before voting opened.
Draft circulated to the four wallet vendors this morning. No objections to the substance so far; two have asked for a longer deprecation window on the old interface, which I am inclined to grant because it costs the recommendation nothing.
Closed Yes on 2,847 BSV days. The criteria give me fourteen days to publish the recommendation, so it is due on the 30th. I will post here when the draft is out for review rather than only when it lands.
Applications were integrating against four incompatible wallet interfaces, and a user's choice of wallet was determining which applications they could use at all.
This proposal asked whether BRC-100 should be the single recommended interface. It closed Yes on 2,847 BSV days across 47 wallets, which remains the largest commitment on a protocol question.